Writing a blog is a curious business. It’s intricate and direct at the same time and a writer can be painstakingly open and brutally honest if the readers can be guaranteed to be total strangers. Then again, if half the relatives, friends and friends’ relatives read it too the writer may sometimes feel the need to be a bit more vague and considerate in what is revealed and in what way are these revelations presented. I occasionally read, with great interest and delight, the blogs of people I know nothing about and will never knowingly meet. I like to see what a random stranger has to say and sometimes I check back later on to catch up on the possible updates. Of course some mutual points of interest is needed between me and the writer and usually it’s related to literature, music or maybe wines.
Reading the blog of someone you know is not as straightforward. The feeling of uneasiness is not that easily eased and voyeuristic guilt tends to raise its’ head pretty fast if people close to you start opening up about personal or perhaps even intimate things in public. None of my closest people have started a blog so far, or if someone has I’m not aware of it. I’m not sure how frequently I would read what they had to say if someone decided to start writing. Written text is always so easy to misinterpret and find (often nonexistent) meanings from. I should know this, after having bashed at or longed for my previous lovers and entensively whined about how miserable my life generally was, for years at Sinisthra.com under the title “Pressure Valve”. Numerous were the times when I was confronted in a bar with questions like “how can you write things like that about me?”. There, of course, is no valid answer to something like that. Sometimes I felt more justified and and sometimes I felt less justified about distilling fiction from grains of truth. Poetic licence is a very feeble excuse indeed but it was all I had to offer as a way of explanation.
That’s all firmly in the past tense now but although I’m more at peace with myself now than I was back then, I still like to just start writing and see what comes out. And I like to publicly contradict myself. Keeping this blog is the best way I could think of to satisfy that need. It didn’t feel right to flood the Sinisthra forum with all kinds of nonsense posts about what books I’m reading or whatever things might irrationally catch my fancy. And I really wanted to keep track of nice things I experienced, whether it was music, wine or something else. Basically this is my private diary, hopefully with enough vagueness added to keep it from becoming embarrassingly detailed so others can read it too. The comments are disabled because I’m not interested in people commenting on what I write. Whatever is written is not written to be commented upon, it’s written because I felt like writing it.
So far I haven’t felt like putting on display any more
essential trivia I was so keen on digging up some years ago. I honestly thought I would but since I haven’t there’s not much point in forcing the silliness. Seems I veer towards tediousness these days. I also like to steer clear of personal puns as much as I can, although not mentioning this would be utter madness: Mr. Mäkinen and his family moved to a bigger apartment in a building next door last weekend and in the heated activity generated by large number of people, some of them presumably at various stages of inebriation, carrying bags and boxes, extremely eager to help, someone set forth a set of events that culminated today in people receiving text messages from him telling that generally it all went very well thank you, except for the minor detail of a sack containing all his clothes having been unretrievably disposed to the garbage compressor.
What’s the meaning of this posts’ title then? How should I know. I woke up with it in my head this morning. Putting it on display here is probably a prime example of unneeded usage of
poetic licence.
THIS WEEKS’ BOOKS OF CHOICE:
I’m ever so slowly wading through “The Encyclopedia Of Stupidity”. It consists of very short essays portraying stupidity in different forms and I suspect it tries to shed some light on the anatomy of stupidity and how it has affected everything during the course of recorded history. I only read it at bed, a few pages every evening before going to sleep so it all feels very surreal and I’m not likely to remember anything about it once the book is finished.
The Literature Map is a great device for finding new authors you might like. Just type in the name of an author whos’ books you’ve enjoyed and it displays an animated cloud of other authors around the name you typed, the closer the location of the name, the more resemblances between the authors. And just now as I tried it out it seems to be out of order. But I’ve used it for over a year without any fusses. The latest name it’s given me is James Blaylock and I’ve just started reading one of his books. More of this later.
THIS WEEKS’ BOTTLES OF CHOICE:I like
Portugal. They have
Moonspell, vinho verde, presumably a very nice weather and lovely landscapes if you know where to look for them, and they produce some amazing red wines. Like
Fonte do Beco. It’s made of a grape I’ve never heard of before and described to be lithe, full-bodied, with hints of vanilla and coffee. The strongish, unusual dominant taste of it was probably vanilla then. The bouquet persistently reminded me of a sauna near a lake although that must have been the “coffee”-part. The taste was wonderful and it strangely made me and the Loved One separately both long for some cheese. Which we are not usually in the habit of having while enjoying wine. The only cheese available was mild emmental and that didn’t exactly do the trick but once the wine was decanted it opened up and didn't ask for some cheese to go anymore. The next day it tasted even better but on the third day the remnants of it had lost a lot of whatever made it great, according to the Loved One. I wasn’t sure if I spotted any difference or not, with my blocked nostril and goldfish memory. Still, a most lovely wine indeed and very likely to be bought again.
I thought it was time find out whatever I might think of Sauvignon Blanc so I looked around a little and instead of a French wine went for
Marichal from Uruguay. Wasn’t very impressed at all. There was too much evidence of the pungent qualities I can’t describe more closely and am not looking forward to finding in white wine. I was also a bit surprised to see the year 2008 on the label. It’s been pressed from grapes only a few months ago. Also from the label I found out that “Uruguay” means in native language “River of the painted birds” and wondered for a while why on earth would anyone want to paint a bird and what are the benefits of a painted bird compared to a non-painted one? Cultural differences probably prevent me from understanding this. Incidentally later on the same day I was offered a glass of Frech Sauvignon Blanc, called
Les Fumées Blanches and I found it just as not to my taste as Marichal so I guess I can safely say Sauvignon Blancs are not for me. Sometime ago, when I was asked to choose wines for an after-wedding party I ended up deciding between Les Fumees and South African Chenin Blanc
KWV and fortunately chose KWV. It was delicious and perfect for a sunny afternoon on a pier by the seaside but regrettably only available in 3 litre boxes. I can't post a pictorial proof of how delicious the wine was by the seaside because the photos contain more male nudity than is absolutely necessary, but I’m sure Sauvignon Blanc wouldn’t have been able to conjure up such light-mindedness.